this is actually objectively horrible and boring

haha how did i know when i saw there was one comment on this review that it would be you. what a clown. how can something be "objectively horrible"? you truly are an idiot

hark struthius-san take a breather and see all the beauty that is in front of you- and lo i asketh

what is the difference between UK neuro post post-illusionary deconstructivist treble step and UK fusionfunky dub-bass traditional tzadik halfstep?? and of which of these categories does this release on tectonic belong to?

the ball is in your court

for obvious reasons, im gunna ignore that ball

you cant youre on the court 5 secs on the buzzer all eyes are on you son what's it gonna be mang??

I like the A side.

@ Struthius - Please stop feeding the troll.

This comment is not about the quality of the music. I haven't heard the record. It's about the quality of the review. Can someone explain to me why this record is given a 3.5 when it is an unqualified good review? There is no negative sentiment or reason anywhere. No ifs or buts at all. Given this, shouldn't it be at least a 4?If it is a 3.5, WHY? And what does this mean?? "Those anticipating an album preview, however, can think again. Not that this EP is in any way disappointing". Huh?

@ Jockspock - A 3.5 means that it's good without being special or memorable. The majority of EPs reviewed on this site get a 3.5 and most of them don't have anything "negative" said about them.

I'm not sure what that quote from the review means however.