 |  |
 | RA Review "Very insular" is how Thom Yorke, in his recent interview with RA, described the laptop-centric production process that birthed The Eraser , his 2006 solo debut. Yorke's approach to Amok , his new album with pseudo-solo project Atoms for Peace, was in many ways a reaction to all those hours spen..
|
 |
Posts / 246
RA Since /Apr 2008
| #1 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 11:59 3/5 is proper here.
|
| |
 |
| #2 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 12:15 Great review, not heard the album yet but haven't been too impressed by the singles I've heard so far. Definitely missing the spark of Radiohead at their best and The Eraser.
|
| |
 |
| #3 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 12:23 My biggest issue with it is the pretty limited pallete of electronic sounds that are used - the same problem afflicts Nigel Godrich's album. They're just not very interesting sounds.
A missed opportunity. Shame.
|
| |
 |
Posts / 27
RA Since /May 2008
| #4 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 13:11 me like it, but critics dont.
|
| |
 |
Posts / 337
RA Since /Nov 2008
| #5 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 14:07 Before Your Eyes & Amok are the best tracks on there...
|
| |
 |
| #6 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 14:28 Posted by madrfadr me like it, but critics dont.
Basically.
|
| |
 |
| #7 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 14:28 I loved the album on first listen. It's always going to straddle the precarious gap between Eraser and his full-on dance stuff, but it's warmer and 'bigger' than Eraser, and what it lacks in coldness and paranoia, it makes up for in accesibility (if a Thom Yorke track can be desceribed that way).
I like it, but not everyone will. If it's appraised against other electronic stuff, of course it's likely to come up short, but against a lot of standard guitar/indie music, it's far more interesting, for me, at least.
|
| |
 |
| #8 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 14:42 Posted by jamesguppy My biggest issue with it is the pretty limited pallete of electronic sounds that are used - the same problem afflicts Nigel Godrich's album. They're just not very interesting sounds.
A missed opportunity. Shame.
Completely agree.
|
| |
 |
Posts / 143
RA Since /Apr 2007
| #9 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 15:33 (Edited: 1 Mar 13 15:40)
|
| |
 |
infinite states Posts / 407
RA Since /Jun 2007
| #10 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 15:55 LOL 3/5 compared to some of the most boring nonsense that gets much higher ratings on here. LOLOLOLOL.
|
| light-years ahead of you...... |
 |
Posts / 127
RA Since /Nov 2010
| #11 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 16:50 When I heard it for a very first time, I was very excited. But since than ... well, let's say, it's average. I like few songs very much (mostly Before Your Very Eyes..., Default, Dropped and Amok) and I also hate (yes, it's pure hate of annoying i-dont-know-exactly-what in that songs) few of them. If you like Radiohead, or at least if you heard about them, first thing you've got to say after this is 'shit, haven't I heard this all before?' 3/5 is absolutely correct rating, in my point of view.
|
| |
 |
Posts / 119
RA Since /Nov 2007
| #12 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 17:30 accurate rating
|
| |
 |
| #13 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 17:32 Sorry but holding Snaith/Caribou up as a shining example of indie/dance idealism is a poopy idea. I love Caribou but that Daphni shit is weak and an affront to both Snaith's true musical skills and to much more capable programmers/writers...like FUCKING NIGEL GOODRICH and THOM YORKE!!! Yeah, Radiohead has fallen into a groovy rut/rutty groove, but it still has more depth and charm that most anyone out there. Eraser is still better than most, and definitely better that Daphni shit.
Haven't heard Atmz fr Pc yet so I can really make no judgements.
Just like RA's review of TKOL, this review reeks of 'oh this ultra hip group/trend of the moment has totally inspired the Radiohead', when the Head/Yorke are just doing what they do, putting out comfortable, interesting SONGS that stand on their own with out young dumb bass music mesmerism.
|
| But anyone who ever had a heart
they wouldn't turn around and break it
and anyone who ever played a part
They wouldn't turn around and hate it
Sweet Jane, Sweet Sweet Jane
...asteaches African-shepherd Astronomer Israel for 6k years."LISTEN Children |
 |
Posts / 2
RA Since /Oct 2009
| #14 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 17:51 Yup, average. although live might be interesting?
|
| |
 |
Posts / 118
RA Since /Dec 2010
| #15 / Fri, 01 Mar 13 18:04 Some of the songs are really catchy, though, and the songs on this album get far closer to that dance-floor euphoria and electronic jouissance than, say, the direly 'wander[ing]' electronic-influenced tracks on the King of Limbs. And that Radiohead stuff gets automatically high-ratings. I think people are quite confused with how to take this project, really. A good review anyway, Jordan... I'm with you on the introvert/extrovert conceit. Great way of looking at this record with The Eraser in retrospect.
|
| |
 |
Posts / 3
RA Since /May 2008
| #16 / Sat, 02 Mar 13 00:15 this album is amazing. 4.5* at least.
|
| |
 |
Posts / 7
RA Since /Jun 2009
| #17 / Sun, 03 Mar 13 01:22 3?????????? JOKE???
|
| |
 |
| #18 / Sun, 03 Mar 13 09:27 ♥
|
| |
 |
Posts / 4
RA Since /May 2009
| #19 / Sun, 03 Mar 13 10:55 You should listen to this at least 5 more times before you review it. you cant be serious about this 3* haha
|
| |
 |
Posts / 1
RA Since /Jul 2009
| #20 / Sun, 03 Mar 13 14:20 Agreed - this is simply amazing on repeated listening. Probably the most interesting thing he's ever done! - 3? -blah
|
| |
 |
Posts / 1
RA Since /Nov 2010
| #21 / Sun, 03 Mar 13 16:11 WTF the rating is just laughable....
|
| |
 |
Posts / 8
RA Since /Feb 2012
| #22 / Sun, 03 Mar 13 20:01 Drowned in Sound, Fact Mag, Slant, The Quietus all give Amok a 3.5; Pitchfork gave it a 3.4; Tiny Mix Tapes, RA, The Wire, the Guardian and Consequence of Sound gave it a 3; Sputnik gave it a 2.8; Pop Matters gave it a 2.5; Dusted Magazine gave it a 2. The general concensus is that Amok is the worst album ever released by Yorke or Radiohead. I agree. It's a 2.
|
| |
 |
Posts / 8
RA Since /Feb 2012
| #23 / Sun, 03 Mar 13 20:05 I got the above ratings from Metacritic.
|
| |
 |
Posts / 8
RA Since /Feb 2012
| #24 / Sun, 03 Mar 13 20:11 The higher ratings for Amok come largely from the usual suspects, those industry insider mags that have little credibility among music lovers - Rolling Stone, Q, NME, Mojo, All Music Guide.
|
| |
 |
Posts / 54
RA Since /Dec 2010
| #25 / Sun, 03 Mar 13 21:36 First impressions always matter. And The Eraser left an impression on me. This one is a good album, a 3 is the best score it can get.
I was hoping Amok would be a different beast, but and emotionally powerful one. Now I know is a different beast, but with barely any emotion. Still happy to get it because of some lovely tracks.
|
| |
 |
Posts / 17
RA Since /Feb 2012
| #26 / Mon, 04 Mar 13 10:31 I actually agree with this review
|
| |
 |
Posts / 2
RA Since /Mar 2013
| #27 / Mon, 04 Mar 13 16:40 i completey disagree with this review, i think a lot of critics are offended that thom does anything other than a radiohead project or a solo one and have a slight anti-flea sentiment and also the fact they have been labeled a supergroup.
it took me about 5 or 6 listens to really judge this album, it is safe to say that technically, it is the best album you'll find anywhere, working with godrich, yorke's programming has hugely improved, godrich is considered to be one of the best producers out their and it shows on this album, technically, it is on a different level, i would argue even to a higher than most radiohead albums.
as a piece of music, is it any good,absolutely, the album is very warm, thoms lyrics are very relevant once you listen to them, and the bass throughout this album definitely shows flea's skills as a bass player, not sure what the reviewer is talking about, may need to change tone on his speakers or something. most important,. the songs are so pleasant to listen to, more so than the eraser and TKOL, both of which a very good albums, this album is and will be considered a great album in the future. the last 4 tracks are as strong a group of tracks thom has ever written, this means this album, for me, is up there with the Kid As of this world with 'stuck together peices' being one of the best of thom's amazing career, he's still very much got it.
please listen to the album at least 5 times to give it a chance to sink in
4.5/5
|
| |
 |
Posts / 2
RA Since /Mar 2013
| #28 / Mon, 04 Mar 13 16:43 remember, these are initial reviews and often change with time, most critics have to review very early and so you should never take them too seriously. these are the same ones who hated Kid A when it came out but soon after said it was a masterpiece, time is important in art.
|
| |
 |
| #29 / Mon, 04 Mar 13 23:30 I really enjoy the album. It's a great piece of work. People are always going to hate on new Thom York projects/work because they judge it against his past work - with goggles of nostalgia - or his/Radiohead's general hype.
I don't really get the RA rating system but I was surprised with this only receiving 3. For me this is a good deal better than many releases receiving higher ratings on this site.
|
| |
 |
Posts / 1
RA Since /Mar 2013
| #30 / Tue, 05 Mar 13 09:00 It is to me a pleasant album with many warm noises and nice tracks. It's nothing that I will find myself poring over for years to come, but I definitely do enjoy listening to it. It isn't ambitious really but the rhythmic and melodic ideas are good enough and well executed. I especially like the last tune, pretty ethereal.
|
| |
 |
|